© Copyright Goldendoodles.com 2001. All rights reserved. You may not copy or otherwise use anything on this site without our written permission.
Some breed magazines a few years ago carried a short article by Doctors Foster and Smith on
dewclaws. Now, these are good vets and good businessmen as well as lovers of dogs, and
besides, one of them looks a little like me, so they must be really good, right? However, I would
like to give another side of the picture than their surgeon's view, that of the breeder, handler,
trainer, naturalist, and judge. These vets concluded that dewclaws are undeveloped and serve no
purpose, and on the basis of this erroneous premise, they advocate removal. I'm not going to play
the purist here and now, as I usually do, to insist that the word “dewclaw” should only be applied
to the first digit on the REAR limb when it exists, and that the one corresponding to a thumb
should simply be called a “first digit”. But I AM suggesting that the first digit on the front limb IS
indeed useful and functional. I have bred Terriers, raised and raced Whippets, reared hundreds of
my own puppies and adults, worked Shepherds in Schutzhund, handled and judged all breeds,
and closely observed all types of dogs. I am sure that vets see some torn small digits, especially
the less-developed rear ones, but I have seen countless active dogs break through crusty snow,
ice, and very rough brush, work on the sleeve in bite work, and both hunt and lure-course over
broken ground with no torn first digits on the forelimb. I have also observed innumerable dogs
using that first digit in manipulating bones, sticks up to the size of logs, balls, and other toys. I
have seen many dogs use them to get out objects that were stuck between their teeth, and to
even to remove (gingerly) material from the eyelids. I have watched them scratch an itch on their
muzzles with these little claws, grasp the Schutzhund sleeve, and do other useful, functional
things with them. I respectfully submit that you might get a second opinion, especially from an
experienced dog trainer/breeder, if your vet wants to remove them.
The forepaw's first digit (sometimes called the medial digit or thumb) has inward and outward
rotator muscles as well as flexor and extensor muscles such as the pollicis brevis. They each have
their own ennervation (motor nerves serving to contract those muscles). On the other hand, the
first digit (muscles, ligaments, and bones) of the hindpaw is usually absent. In those breeds where
it is completely developed, branches of an extensor and a flexor muscle accompany its own
muscle, the hallucis brevis, a very weak and “fleshy” organ --- so weak and soft, in fact, that it
could be said that the dog has no observable motor control of it.
What about those true dewclaws, the ones on the rear limbs? I agree that these seem to be
useless appendages, as I've never seen any muscular control over them, even in the breeds
whose standards require them to be present, such as the Briard or Beauceron or Great Pyrenees.
I wonder what reason they are there, too, when they have been lost from the genotype of most
other breeds, but I haven't seen any torn-up dewclaws on such dogs as have them. I haven't
worked those breeds on sheep flocks, so I can't be as sure, but I tend to give at least mild
approval of their recommendations here. I can imagine these lower-to-the ground, non-
prehensile claws being snagged in very rough use, such as might accompany the injuries to the
stop pads I've seen in coursing hounds. Some people have claimed that they interfere with good
movement in the ring by brushing against each other and the hock on the opposite leg, but I can
tell you I've seen many a true, single-tracking single- and double-dewclaw dog moving away with
no trace of interference, and I've never seen a movement fault that I could attribute to the
presence of those claws.
So, do you want to get rid of the ones on the rear in your German Shepherd Dog (usually
imported) or other breeds in which the show fashion does not call for them? Go ahead. If you
wish not to be bothered with it yourself, or if the “roots” are very developed; i.e., if the bones in
that phalange are ossified and/or there is an active growth plate, surgery at the clinic is the way to
go. Now, I won't suggest you do otherwise, because some reactionary young vet might kick up
some dust with accusations about you practicing veterinary medicine without a license, but I can
tell you what I've seen and heard or done, and you can take them as anecdotes rather than
advice. Remember that animal husbandry, the father of veterinary practice, is itself a timeless
occupation of farmers, shepherds, and drovers; the people who worked with their own animals
and successfully treated them were asked by their neighbors for help and gradually became
“horse doctors”.
Numerous breeders or owners today still do their own tail docking, ear cropping, medicating,
removal of gas from the belly of a colic-stricken sheep or other animal, first aid, even minor
suturing. I have neighbors who castrate their own pigs and de-horn their own cattle, and
dairymen friends who remove dead or breech calves by reaching in up to their armpits.
Therefore, can it be at all surprising that many dog breeders remove dewclaws themselves? They
find that if it is tiny and has the appearance of being loosely attached “by a thread”, it is easy to
remove a dewclaw at home. The typical practice is to tie a very tight knot around it, as close to the
body as possible, and on as young a dog as possible, and as the pup grows the stricture will
become relatively tighter. Nutrient supply to the little flap is prevented, and eventually (often in
just a few days), the piece dries up and falls off. Most people use dental floss or nylon filament,
cutting the ends short enough not to be an attraction to the pup or its dam, and long enough to
see that it is still there until the operation is complete. This is the same method used by people
who dock their own puppies' tails, in which case the medium used is most often a very tight
rubber band: the unwanted portion of the tail simply falls off. Many prefer this to the sudden, but
very slightly traumatic surgical approach at the veterinary clinic. They claim the pup experiences
only minor and fleeting discomfort, and there is no need for sutures, usually not a drop of blood,
and no infection or bill for antibiotics and an office visit at that time. It's your dog, and your
choice. Make it a wise and humane one.
Incidentally, while in Germany one year for the largest specialty show in the world, I was shown
an instrument sold for castration of pigs and sheep, but used by the breeders for docking tails
also. It looked like a pliers but had four rod-shaped “jaws” instead of two grippers. When the
handles were squeezed hard, the prongs opened (spread) the tough elastic rubber cord into a
wider circle (actually a square), and what was before a very small-diameter O-ring was now big
enough to fit over a scrotum or tail. When the handles were relaxed, the ring came off and closed
amazingly tightly. Animals felt little or no discomfort, but lost those parts that were no longer
getting nourishment from the blood supply.
.....................................................
Copyright Fred Lanting, All rights reserved, but reprinting allowed after permission. Please read
his other articles on SiriusDog.com, for example, or e-mail him at Mr.GSD@netscape.com or
Mr.GSD@Juno.com for specific articles.
Editor’s Note: A well-respected and frequent GSD specialty and all-breed judge for many clubs
around the world, with KC and other-country credentials, Mr. Lanting since 1966 has lectured on
Gait-and-Structure, Canine Orthopedic Disorders, and other topics, and has judged in about 30
countries. He has been described by a former OFA director as the world’s leading non-
veterinarian authority on hip dysplasia. He has lectured at numerous veterinary schools in the
USA and abroad, and is the author of the following “must read” books for the dog owner (E-mail
for curriculum vitae). “Canine HD and Other Orthopedics Disorders” : This expanded revision is a
comprehensive (nearly 600-page), amply illustrated, annotated, monumental work that is suitable
as a coffee-table book, a reference work for breeders and veterinarians, and a study adjunct for
veterinary students. It is equally valuable for the owner of any breed. It covers every aspect of HD
and other orthopedic, bone, or spinal disorders, and includes genetics, diagnostic methods,
treatment options, and the role of environment. Your autographed copy will be mailed from the
USA as soon as the appropriate amount is received and is processed. Pricing: US $68 in the U.S.,
or ask about mail overseas. Combine orders with “The Total German Shepherd Dog” by the same
author ($50 plus $4 postage). 17 of the 20 chapters are suitable for owners of any breed. Order
both at once direct from the author, and the postage will be waived.
Another Look at Dewclaws
Another Look at Dewclaws
by Fred Lanting 2001
Reproduced with permission
The information contained on this site is in no way intended to replace that of proper veterinary advice, diagnosis or treatment.
It is meant to provide resource, so that we can better understand canine health related issues.